I'd agree those "rolling coal" people are what got most of this running I suspect.
...
nGauge which was a very popular tuning platform has now filed bankruptcy and close up shop.
Better get educated on this and not think it's someone elses' problem to deal with if you enjoy this hobby/sport. I'm reaching out to my representatives today.
@Magnified have you looked at the RPM ACT to see if it will actually make sense? That's next on my list. Starts here:
https://www.sema.org/epa-news what I keep seeing is "convert street cars permanently in to race cars" and while I agree that's important what about the weekend warrior guys that want to use race mods for off road, then convert back to drive on the street, seems that's left out.
On nGuage, if I remember correctly they were one of the big "F emissions controls, do whatever you want" facilitators. If that is the case, yes, you're basically going to be out of business. It's like folks on here, who shall remain nameless, who got on Youtube and basically told law enforcement and prosecutors "I lied to you and got away with it." When you go that, you might get by for a while, but once your big red flag gets them to focus on you, they'll bust your nuts. The law is the law (at least for now in this country).
As for the RPM Act, when I read it I think its impact will be minimal in things like this. It only allows conversion of street cars to purpose built race vehicles and exempts them from compliance. It still requires they not be driven on the public streets, etc.... So it would have no impact on rolling coal nitwits, or on modded Hellcats still driven on the streets (IF they fail compliance). Back when I was in Houston I think Magnusson was having a personality conflict because my supercharger said both that it was CARB compliant AND that it was for offroad use only. At one point when I was having computer problems I had to take it to the DPS testing facility (not just the local tail pipe sniffer) and have them run a full path study on it (without me present). It passed, but even if it hadn't I was ready to use a special registration exemption to get it approved. I think the end argument for the EPA is they want to legitimately do the job they are entrusted with by the nation, including protect the air from harmful pollutants. They played nice with the auto and SE market and got given the finger with the rolling coal and diesel test BS and that basically gave them no option. If they want to ensure enforcement and they can't even trust the OEM then they'll try to prohibit any changes from stock (and they may have an argument - if OEM is putting HC, GT500, RS6 Avant, etc... in people's hands, its not like there's a shortage of high HP cars available.... TO THE RICH is my key point). Easier to police the few manufacturers than everyone hotrodding their car. In the end, RPM Act wont fix any of that.
The industry and SEMA must in my opinion cooperate with the EPA and negotiate (EPA will negotiate). My play would be to offer some form of new assurance program: for example, the shop or tuner (or OEM) must certifiy that the modified car is still emissions compliant (and there will be substantial compliance violation penalties for the shop and the owner of the car if its not) and have that certified by the a third party or state tester. You can still get a hell of a lot of performance out of a car that meets EPA standards. And if there are folks who want to go whole hog full racing conversion, I believe the EPA will still be willing to exempt full conversions totally. But something must be done to rebuilt trust - you cannot have folks blatantly flouting the law and OEM actively working to undermine enforcement. If folks think the law is wrong, fight to change it; just because you don't like it doesn't mean you can break it any more than the stick up man who thinks the money in the till should be his and not the banks.
I'd love to help set this up and move towards a resolution, but I don't know who SEMA is paying to do their legal and I personally feel that many large law firms have ulterior motives. Sometimes solving the problem in my opinion takes a second set to extending the problem for revenue production reasons.